Task: Assist a large IT company in closing multiple vacancies in a short period of time.

Were there any differences in the candidates and resumes we provided compared to other agencies?

We worked with several agencies, and when it comes to candidates from Geekfactor, there has always been an exact match.

Many agencies try to focus on quantity and send almost everyone they find. That's why I appreciate the good quality of candidates and prompt communication from your managers at Geekfactor.

Skyeng has specific corporate requirements for soft skills

Skyeng is very fast-paced, and for us, flexibility and proactivity of candidates are important.

We always look at communication skills, teamwork, flexibility to changes — and this is one of the main reasons why we reject candidates.

From Geekfactor, there were few candidates whom we rejected based on soft skills — at least very few.

Overall, how was your experience working with Geekfactor? Any future wishes and growth points?

Three key reasons why we work with Geekfactor for hiring IT specialists:

Always prompt communication and highlighting of difficulties, problems, and just the market status. This is important for us, and we got it — it was super valuable.

The quality of candidates was as close as possible to what we requested, and it is valuable to us when agencies focus on quality rather than quantity. It's better to show one superfit candidate per week than ten candidates whom we will reject.

I particularly like your accompanying letters with resumes — they are concise, without unnecessary information, clear, and to the point. They contain what is important to us — briefly about experience, tech stack, candidate's expectations, salary, and so on.